Results of working with divine guidance: a paradigm shift

When one works with divine guidance, where does this lead to?

There are several topics that can be mentioned. And one of them is a shift in worldview.

Nothing actually changed when people started thinking that the Earth is round and not flat or that the Earth moves around the Sun (instead of the Sun moving around the Earth). In daily life, the streets and fields looked as flat as before. And the Sun still rose in the East each morning and went down in the West each evening. It was just a change in the worldview in people’s minds.

And yet it had large consequences because the way was paved for more scientific discoveries.

When working with divine guidance, there is a similar shift in worldview in store for us. Namely, that consciousness does not originate from the neurons of the brain, but that it is prior to everything material. That means the neurons of the brain (and everything else in the 3d realm) originate from consciousness.

Consciousness is another dimension. And much like a three-dimensional sphere would at the same time encompass and pervade a two-dimensional plane (for an entertaining story with examples, see book and movie Flatland ), so does consciousness at the same time encompass our world and also pervade everything.

This shift in worldview can happen before working with divine guidance. For example, for me, it happened when I read many stories about little children who started talking about their past lives spontaneously out of the blue, and also when I read many Near Death Experiences.

Or the shift in worldview can happen during the journey with divine guidance because so many things happen which cannot be explained with the former worldview.

In the former worldview where the world consist of separate objects and people moving around randomly and where consciousness does not survive the death of the physical body, it is hard to explain things like channeling dead people, telepathy, precognitive dreams, or synchronicities.

I came from a scientific/materialistic worldview, and it was a big shift for me to accept that consciousness is prior to everything. When this realization hit me, I remember that I felt the floor shaking below me. Suddenly my solid former world had become instable and I could feel it physically as some kind of vertigo.

I think that this paradigm shift is currently happening in society, but it is still located in the fringes of what is publicly accepted.

In science, people are still trying to find out how consciousness arises from the activity of neurons in the brain. For example, this article Decoding the neuroscience of consciousness (published July 2019) says,

Newly developed techniques for measuring brain activity are enabling scientists to refine their theories about what consciousness is, how it forms in the brain and where the boundaries lie between being conscious and unconscious. 

” “It’s still just fundamentally mysterious how consciousness happens,” says Anil Seth, a cognitive and computational neuroscientist and co-director of the Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science at the University of Sussex in Brighton, UK.

As scientists have become more adept at detecting consciousness, they have begun to determine which brain regions and circuits are most important. But there is still much debate about what constitutes consciousness in neural terms, with particular disagreement over which brain processes and regions matter most.

So, that is what scientists think: ‘Just look long enough and close enough at the brain activity. Measure it, think deeply, discuss, and publish. And then finally one day, we should be able to really understand how consciousness is produced by the brain. And where exactly it is located. Because the fact that consciousness is produced by the brain is our assumption. Our infallible assumption which must not be challenged. And it is such an infallible assumption truth that there is not even a need to state explicitly that this is our basic assumption on which we operate.’

That infallible-assumption thing reminds me of the Catholic Church and how it was upset when Galileo said that the Earth moves around the Sun.

And the article quoted above was not written like 100 years ago, but fairly recently in 2019.

But within the new paradigm, studying the neurons in the brain to find out how consciousness happens is about as smart as if one would look at the electronic currents in the TV set in one’s living room trying to find out how the evening news broadcast is created in the TV.

Everyone would laugh at that fruitless attempt.

Isn’t that ironic how it was the church which said that the Sun revolves around the Earth? And woe unto you, Galileo, if you dare to challenge that belief!
And now it’s science’s turn to make a fool of itself and say that they believe that consciousness comes from the brain and woe unto everyone who dares to challenge that assumption! They might lose their license to teach at the university.

And in the meantime, some people who came from the materialistic worldview and were forced by their life’s circumstances to accept this paradigm shift that consciousness exists independently of a functioning brain are contributing to the shift.

For example, one of them is Eben Alexander, a neurosurgeon who had a near-death experience which changed his worldview. He wrote the bestselling book Proof of Heaven about his experience (with currently more than 16.000 customer reviews on Amazon).

Maybe enough stories like his will help the new paradigm to seep from the fringes into mainstream thinking. Or if that doesn’t work, maybe it needs personal experience for each and everyone. So, in order to shift the paradigm, maybe everyone needs their own near-death experience, out-of-body experience, past-life memories, alien abduction experiences, after-death communication experiences, ghost encounters, telepathy, etc.

Regarding the time frame, I was hoping that, well, maybe in a few decades this new paradigm that consciousness is the basis of everything has become mainstream.

But if I consider that it took the Roman Catholic Church more than 350 years to admit that Galileo was right, then if science takes the same amount of time to shift its paradigm, that may mean it may well take another few centuries instead of just decades.

So, if you are on a spiritual path and your paradigm shifts, then this might mean that you live in a different paradigm than the mainstream for the rest of your life. Which may have advantages and disadvantages. It can feel a bit like being a Hogwarts student and living among muggles. Sometimes lonely, at other times exciting.

14 thoughts on “Results of working with divine guidance: a paradigm shift

  1. Karin, I really enjoyed this post. It sparked so much in me. Lately I have been reflecting more and more on where individual identity stems from. Do we as ” spirit in meat suits” like what we like and do what we do because of free will mixed with environment and genetics ( and astrology) or are we simply responding to the quantum and what it decides for us ” before we receive the input?” Many of us here at WP and other similar groups/platforms live outside the mainstream and our families. I have been in that category for most of my adult life and probably earlier but without any clarity. Could you write more on this in future posts?



    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thank you, I am glad to hear that you enjoyed the post and that it sparked something in you.
      Thanks for your good questions. These are great topics to think about. I am planning to write about coming into alignment with one‘s soul. This will also touch upon the riddle of free will.
      But regarding individual identity and where it comes from, I wasn‘t planning to write about that. I found the channeling in the book The Anne Dialogues by Guy Needler illuminated a bit about that topic. Some of his other books might even offer more insight. But I haven‘t read them (yet).


      Liked by 3 people

      1. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on soul and free will. BTW I looked up Anne Dialogues and was very drawn to the description so I ordered it. I really am fascinated by the whole incarnation “game” as it were, lol!


        Liked by 2 people

        1. I hope you like the Anne Dialogues. I found it fascinating. But I needed to read the glossary first because there were so many unfamiliar terms in the book. At the end, I still hadn‘t figured out what he meant by the term ‚Om‘, but the other terms were defined in the glossary and that was very helpful.

          Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, I like that analogy, too. I even thought that it would be nice to have a little cartoon. Like two people in doctor‘s clothing placing their stethoscopes on different part of the TV. And one doctor says, „I found it! The evening news is created in this spot!“
      But the other doc replies, „No, you are wrong. I am sure it is created up here in this corner.“


  2. Well written Karin, they will get there…but by then we will be sitting in the love of ‘paradise’ while they continue stethoscop’ing everything. I have my proof in working with Spirit all the time, but I think even ‘up there’ has its layers of experiences. The day I was dying on my kitchen floor from a allergic response to a medicine, and God speaks to you in this very beautiful, loving voice…there is no way I could deny what I had touched. Mmm, maybe that’s what needs to be done, could you imagine one of those staid scientists getting an experience like that, it would throw everything they knew out the door…as it does in your story above of the respected neurosurgeon having his experience and writing a book about it because it is so powerful an event 😀 ❤️ 🙏🏽 🦋

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks for your comment. Thanks for sharing about your NDE. That sounds very amazing.
      Yes, NDEs tend to shift people‘s worldviews big time and would shift the worldviews of these scientists. Their souls will decide whether they need to have an NDE as a wake-up call.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. “consciousness does not originate from the neurons of the brain, but that it is prior to everything material. That means the neurons of the brain (and everything else in the 3d realm) originate from consciousness.”
    Very well said. Thank you as always for clarity.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. I’m following your Blog now Karin though I’m doubtful about the impure clutter of phenomena you introduce in your post, ie. dreams, near death experiences, alien abduction etc. Sufis would wince at these too I think. They are distractions, human mind stuff.

    But your news that some scientists are now demolishing the fallacy that the brain invents Reality/Consciousness, is very welcome.

    My multiple annual mystical experiences of Reality/Consciousness, (MERs), lead me to say for a long time that the brain is simply a receiver of Reality/Consciousness not it’s creator.

    Best wishes,


    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for following my blog and for commenting and sharing about where you agree and where you don‘t agree. I am glad to hear you also see the brain as a receiver.

      Thank you for sharing about your mystical experiences. How wonderful that you also have book about them in addition to your blog.

      Regarding what you call „impure clutter of phenomena“ in my post, I think that certain paranormal experiences can be stepping stones on the path which can serve to crack people open. They can also occur as a side effect on spiritual path.
      I agree that these experiences can become distractions.

      Personally, I am curious about the vast variety of phenomena which people experience. And I appreciate it when people find the courage to share their paranormal experiences.


By commenting, you agree to the privacy policy,

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.